Edward J. Deak
Department of Economics
Fairfield University
Fairfield, CT 06430
Phone: 203-254-4000 x2866
Office: Don 327
DrDeak@edwardjdeak.com

Spring 2001
Office Hours
M/W 2:30 -4 pm
Th 1:30 - 2:30 pm

Home
Economics 11
Economics 12
Economics 125
Economics 245

Economics 125 -- Global Competition and Competitiveness

Texts
  • Michael Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press: New York, 1990
  • Michael L. Dertouzos, Richard K. Lester and Robert M. Solow, Made in America, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1989. (DLS)
 
Grading
  • Your grade in this course will total 1300 points and be compiled as follows:
  • There will be two one-hour exams worth 150 points each and a final exam worth 260 points.  There will be four student researched and written reports on examples of competitiveness worth 50 points each.  There will be 12 weekly in-class case discussions worth 20 points each, and 15 written microtheme assignments worth 20 points each.  A missed assignment will receive a grade of zero in the absence of an acceptable and verifiable excuse.  There are no excuses for a missed microtheme.  No make-up exams or substitute assignments will be allowed.  I reserve the right to alter your final mark by up to 1/2 letter grade depending upon the quality of your class participation.
  • The university policy regarding academic honesty will be in full force at all times.
 
Student Competitiveness Assignments

    Four times during the semester each student must find, research, analyze and provide a type written report on a competitiveness case found in a non-newspaper source. The purpose of the exercise is to get you to think independently and creatively about the problem of competitiveness. The analysis is to be no less than 1 and 1/2 nor more than 2 typed pages. It is not to be a summary of the article but rather, it should accomplish as much as possible of the following: 

    • Identify the competitive focus (issues) of the article 
    • Explain how competition is taking place -- tools, concepts
    • Identify the leaders and explain why they are successful or failing
    • Identify the role of prices, differentiation, costs, innovation, entry, scale, etc...
    • Analyze any international aspects
    • Examine any efficiency elements such as cost reduction or productivity upgrading
    • Compare the article to class material developed so far. Identify the article as important because it: reinforces, extends, or contradicts a specific concept discussed in class
    Your competitive report should have a title page with: (click for details)
    • Your name, course, assignment
    • Article title, including source, date and page
    • The following summary outline in one-line bullet form:
    • Group focus -- product, firm, industry, nation
    • Domestic or international competition
    • Competitive focus
    • Form of competition / competitiveness
    • Identify leaders / participants
    • Why leaders are successful or failing
    • Goal of competitive activity
    • Efficiency aspects
    • Relevance of article

    You must hand in two Xeroxed copies of the article.

    Good but not exclusive reference sources would include the following publications (some of these sources may have web sites with interesting articles):

    • Fortune magazine
    • The Economist
    • Time
    • Harvard Business Review 
    • Inc. 
    • U.S. News and World Report 
    • Business Week 
    • Forbes
    • Newsweek

    You are restricted in your source search to the following: 

    • Assignment #1 -- Any source dated 1/1/00 to 6/30/00
    • Assignment #2 -- Any source dated 1998 or 1999
    • Assignment #3 -- Any source dated 7/1/00 to 12/31/00
    • Assignment #4 -- Any source dated in 2001

    Your grade will depend upon the following: 

    • The quality of the article selected: technical sophistication, focus on key issues
    • The insight and analytical content of your report
    • The quality and style of your written presentation
    • The quality of your oral presentation, when requested
 
Small GroupDiscussion and Peer Review Process

Some of the cases, microthemes and competitiveness assignments will be discussed within small, in-class groups. The group will be responsible for a collective response or analysis toward the end of the class. Group response grades may be assigned to each member where appropriate. Groups will be formed by me, using the seating arrangement, and will be changed at least once during the semester.

A peer review process will be employed to evaluate the quality of the student competitiveness assignments. You will read a class member's assignment, and construct a written, and graded evaluation of that effort. You will be supplied with a pre-printed form to guide you in your assessment. Your written evaluation will serve as a microtheme for you, and receive a grade. Be careful: a poorly done evaluation, or an unjustly praiseworthy one, will result in a low microtheme grade for you. Your goal is to be tough, but fair, in your evaluation of the work of others. You may wish to use the following grading guidelines in forming your evaluation: 

  • "a" - outstanding work: significant, insightful, creative
    "b" - much better than average: thoughtful, important
    "c" - work expected from the typical/average college student
    "d" - below average: dull, lacking imagination, error prone, lacking in importance or thoughtful evaluation.
    "f" - failing: unworthy of recognition
    You may add a "+" or "-" to your grade evaluation, as you see fit.
 
Case Assignments
There are 12 case studies, some with accompanying microthemes, which will usually be discussed on Wednesdays. You must read the case before class, and be prepared to answer questions as well as discuss competitive aspects of each case. Your case grade will depend upon the quality of your oral participation that day. An unexcused absence from class will result in a case grade of zero.
 
Microtheme Assignments
Typical microtheme assignments will involve an article or collection of articles on a specific competitiveness topic. They will be accompanied by a brief list of questions for which you must provide a prose, type-written response of no more than one page in total. The response is to be an answer to the question(s) not a summary of the article. To get the most out of each assignment, you should always ask yourself: why was this article assigned? How does it relate to the topics in our earlier classes or readings? 

There will be a minimum of 20 microtheme assignments worth 20 points each. The fifteen highest scores will count towards your final grade. Microtheme responses are due at the start of the next class following their assignment. No had written or late responses will be accepted. All microtheme topics are possible subjects for exam questions.

 
 
   

Readings and Schedule

 
 

The usual pattern for reading assignment and class schedule will be

  • Monday -- Discussion of Porter, and DLS readings, written microthemes.
  • Wednesday -- Discussion of Porter, and DLS, case study discussion.
  • Thursday -- Lecture topics, student competitiveness assignments, written microthemes, exams

The case assignment schedule will be maintained regardless of our ability to keep up with the rest of the readings

 
 
1.  
Jan 17-18
  • The story of IBM -- Schumpeter's "dynamic competition"
  • A new theory of competitiveness -- Porter ch.1
  • The problem of American competitiveness -- DLS ch.1
  • The new American century" -- Fortune 1991 handout 
2.  
Jan 22-25
  • Competitiveness measures -- Productivity & value added productivity comparisons -- DLS ch.2 
  • Competitive strategy -- Porter pp.33-53 
  • DLS Case A -- The auto industry and auto microtheme 
  • www.whitehouse.gov -- recent productivity data
3.  
Jan 29-Feb 1
  • Competing internationally -- Porter pp.53-68 
  • Outdated strategies -- DLS ch.3 
  • DLS Case B -- The chemicals industry and microtheme 
  • STUDENT COMPETITIVENESS ASSIGNMENT #1 
4.  
Feb 5-8
  • Determinants of Competitive Advantage -- Porter ch.3 
  • The internet and global competitiveness, Short time horizons -- DLS ch.4 
  • Global value and enterprise -- Reich ch.7 & 8 
  • DLS Case C -- Commercial aircraft industry and microtheme 
  • Industry speaker or microtheme assignment 
5.  
Feb 12-15
  • Dynamics of Competitive Advantage -- Porter ch.4 
  • Technological weakness -- DLS ch.5 
  • Porter Case #1 -- German printing press -- pp.179-95 
  • EXAM #1 -- Thursday 2/17
6.  
Feb 19
President's Day -- No Class
7.  
Feb 21-22
  • Competition and Trade with Japan and Asia. -- Porter pp.384-421 
  • Frontline film -- Japan winning the war 
  • Japanese Microtheme Assignments
8.  
Feb 26-Mar 1
  • Competitive Advantage in services -- Porter pp.239-54 
  • Service productivity -- McKinsey handout 
  • Neglect of human resources -- DLS ch.6 
  • DLS Case D -- Consumer electronics industry and microtheme 
  • STUDENT COMPETITIVENESS ASSIGNMENT #2 
9.  
March 5-8 
  • National advantage in services -- Porter pp.254-273 
  • Failures of cooperation -- DLS ch.7 
  • Porter Case #2 -- U.S. patient monitoring equipment -- pp.195-210 
  • Industry speaker or microtheme assignment 
10.  
March 12-15

Spring Break -- No Class

11.  
March 19-22
  • Patterns of competitive advantage in the U.S. and the European Union with special reference to Germany -- Porter pp.277-307 & 335-382 
  • Government and industry at cross purposes -- DLS ch.8 
  • DLS Case E -- Machine tool industry and microtheme 
  • Industry speaker or microtheme assignment 
12.  
March 26-29
  • Competitive Advantage in Italy and Korea -- Porter pp.383-84, 421-79 
  • Best industrial practice -- DLS ch.9 
  • Porter Case #3 -- Italian ceramic tile -- pp.210-225 
  • EXAM #2 -- Monday March 29th 
13.  
April 2-7
  • Competitive development of national economies -- Porter ch10 
  • A more productive America -- DLS ch.10 
  • DLS Case F -- semiconductors & computers, microtheme 
  • Student Competitiveness Assignment #3 
14.  
April 9-11
  • Competitive company strategy -- Porter ch.11 
  • Porter Case #4 -- Japanese robotics -- pp.225-238 
15.  
April 12

Holy Thursday -- No Class

16.  
April 16

Easter Monday -- No Class

17.  
April 18-19
  • Competitive government strategy -- Porter ch.12 
  • Strategy for industry, labor and government -- DLS ch.11 
  • DLS Case G -- The steel industry and microtheme 
  • Industry Speaker or Microtheme
18.  
April 23-26
  • National agendas -- Porter pp.683-723 
  • How universities should change -- DLS ch12 
  • DLS Case H -- The textile industry and microtheme 
  • Student Competitiveness Assignment #4 
19.  
April 30 
  • Agenda for the U.S. -- Porter pp.723-734 
  • Policy recommendations -- DLS ch.13, and appendix i 
20.  
May 1999

FINAL EXAM